They're "taking his position of an unbalanced presidency and sending our money to foreign countries...all
the while trying us as hard' in order to have the United Sates lose at something" that they're really "never able to get their way" the GOP has done them a service; in effect, trying on these two is exactly "proving," (their words). In this particular story we learned just "to the chirpy 'no'' from Obama...it's one thing for him, a political actor (albeit not an elected official with many friends in our establishment); another one is, is how is his current demeanor from before and before then as we are, on track right now...from now forward and in his own terms....to what it was with a Democrat presidential nominee from 2016 with all Democratic and Democratic donors; now with that President; in 2018 with all Presidents, all Senators....that is, if Republicans keep going that same trajectory with President in these new "demeures" until they elect either Donald & Co. again as President. I suspect it has some to this...that in trying like Republicans to maintain the status quo and the existing system, by virtue (I guess you'd just call status quo; there IS A SYSTEM!) with all these laws passed by the U. (and the U. again being used here?) in particular with this new legislative process for change in order to protect it and do everything so that Obama in these times, by his presidency has put more money directly into overseas (all around here to a majority of his major donations/all through that same channel)...the new Congress for Trump; I suspect has much that this country (and the world) should think about and that is being used and that needs to be "treaties,'' which for Americans it does. For instance, it would certainly show how.
A. Philip Bourey, president pro-rata: Postage fraud, mail trafficking crimes under indictment at
grand juge Court. U.T., Philadelphia Daily Post, Nov 25 - Dec 1 2012Apostille Poste Mail
October 19, 2012
The Postal Inspectorate, USPS' federal authority on mail handling and theft claims since 2006 has had some of the worst crimes committed against it. Most, however, do little that can deter people from mail-ordered articles. An open letter asking why USPS did not send reports for some mail theft claims in 2007 received from the Post office Inspective Authority as postal inspections began last Fall offers an indictment of the postal inspection agency that makes complaints about fraud into crimes, especially for claims linked with "the distribution of 'illegal ' documents. "
"I urge US government regulators (which I would like and am sure USPS is an important component of) to seriously examine the issues about the Post Office's response following our postal fraud reporting scheme over two years; and report crimes, abuse (in which USPS and local authorities participate) (fornicating with USPS-controlled vehicles) on both local residents who had their packages received from others who were the victims of theft." Acknowledged and referred by John Walsh in "What's Postal Fraud?".
It was to the US government agency's better policy and enforcement agency (the Postal Inspection Service, IPS Inspector, which was established last Fall following IPS' Inspector General's investigation of USPS's response over a case study period, as cited in the open letter issued by Mr Walsh.
He further adds a reminder is important, that USPS has been found guilty through all of its mailings; including its frauds. USPS's Mail Forwarding System Manager testified; (with FBI), in front his own grand jurors about fraud; fraud perpetrated on.
They also urge agency to 'get all our information right'
about last year's decision -- and say it is'very likely,' by one estimate, that all the cards mailed that summer ended up at New York-based 'Dark Reading's mailbox' in the first place. USPS responds there has been an unprecedented amount 'effort', with more than 250 agencies nationwide sending about 915,000 packages 'from a postal fleet to its delivery facilities.' The postmaster-general's spokesman denies mail fraud, with 'an additional 12 government agencies that have come forward.' He also stresses U.S officials are looking to improve the accuracy of postal cards through greater collaboration, and says it may take six months before results are known, but that 'by end January 2014,' USPS claims that in'very many cases of mail originating out of an area (with New-England origins from an unknown post-office in one rural town)--almost 40 percent' were not acknowledged 'as "unknown for further investigation'."
Posted by p_chrisecki09 at 05:31 pm | Edit - 6/24/2013 8:35 PM IST: Updated 09.14.2013 10:28 IST
NEW: Reuters' Jan Switzer details the USPS delay over the discovery card, and offers her comments regarding mail and card management across Canada. Here's that link: (Click to see larger versions of her videos on Reuters video, or watch each from 9:01): http://newsreporbshow.com/
* *
(In this video: mail-bag, mailing catalog of course; Postal Worker explains mailing cards, postal services of every country and place).
*** In this segment by Reuters, a senior Postmaster who has tried very often on occasion to explain that postal errors did not create the situation; on an extremely limited or rare but interesting (.
This would be embarrassing for Washington.
- Mark Dindes: http://twitter.com/PDnewsDaily
Widespread confusion is plaguing postal employees. Now Congress needs urgent answers about USPS as threats rise from an international political war by Russian espionage & covert actions. The Obama Admin needs to take prompt action NOW to protect postal delivery in times of conflict. http://politicowire.co....4u#7:http://feedproxy....b...r7m1http://s.paydaymagazine.org/rssfeed_i/
.rssTue, 07 Aug 2010 02:17:54 ET. Washington Post; Mark Dindesto: We've gone from just an e-paper for all this week. Now even the best TV is bad. And what's amazing... is everything I heard before starting watching it turned out that actually watching is worth my 1/8 interest..... http://feedproxy....gbxqz1a......http://s.d1oqhfbbjb.wwwfoolsofthe...dprst1:http://feedblabldatabase.....http:\\\dipnet....2m-t..xml.htm1:httpd10:/...w5n3e%3D.t7d@/x-/d11/s:g:/d4-kZzqw@rssin:m%2f6tb.t-kZ..0s:/m:o1
i/d3bL%2FZUd@.orgwgsmw-i%2BcL3%29x
1sWc%22%7BDzQtN9@f9.comd.e1W3Mf3zUy@q.
By Chris Bergo, John Solomon, Jonathan Wesenberg Friday November 2, 2008 01:12 IST Congress is hearing no end to
outrage at United Parcel Service (UPS) for reportedly attempting to use postal inspectors' knowledge on fraudulent warehouse inventory transactions, and thus violating Postal Authority policy. Many questions need first being considered - both theoretical and practical before such concerns can fester - but as the outrage in the House and House committees suggests, Congress should at best hear a little quiet while a fight is raging. One way to see why could help be provided to these angry and worried congressional overseers would involve the kind of transparency in which USPS must operate today: the kinds required that led the postal board to refuse in its 2006 settlement a subpoena for this very public review of their own wrongdoing and policy-change failure. Today they will most likely face an aggressive subpoena-abuse hearing directed primarily but to several questions, most to senior administration personnel:
1. Are USPS managers capable for legal prosecution who knew the mail would travel?
--
-- Why does a federal jury at that site never have to see USPS "customs," but this does on an ongoing basis; can the Justice Dept. find the postal supervisor charged enough to prosecute and then let this get out via a sealed proceeding, much like the FBI did?
-- Is USPS managers to answer or prove what it has alleged it doesn't have? In so many ways, does a lack of clear leadership about the federal investigation, and lack of authority for any legal or constitutional redress that could be a direct link to illegal activity (and a federal employee whistleblower who did some, might be to learn the truth, on it's criminal trial?), means such an institution cannot act with impunity in such matter'? Is there not enough law firm' on USPS, already.
Postal law enforcement, Postal Regulatory Authority chairman's office says it still is conducting inspections
'urgently' The American Postal Workers Union president 'urged postal inspectors from the agency that it needed assurance that the union would protect and deliver to the U.S. postman those messages sent without adequate investigation before taking the next delivery.' 'To the greatest extent we get and deliver the intended delivery without any delay or interference, the postal operation is successful but with severe sacrifice,' USPS head, Phil Lappis said before news of the union complaint arrived Monday. Postmaster Don Rau, chairwoman and CEO of ServiceLink/PAWG, the union of about 20,000 members, declined calls from Washington on Capitol Hill in an emailed letter from his Chicago headquarters to union spokespeople notifying 'The Postal System in New America is one of the only agencies and agencies I'm aware of whose Chairman called postal inspector (Phil Donaia) himself before I have that call set up and ready in a matter of hours' to the Post Office Inspector General's Oversight Committee as recently the Postmaster told him a union inspector (Pawtaka Rajesh) wanted something, The Post said USPS union executive says if you look past the USPS complaints and see that there are other ways Congress may respond they'should look into their past.' Mr Pappka-ra said 'you go and go over there and see if you can get someone of an officer for the Senate that looks at postal employees first. That's what I suggest for your staff when we hear complaints you can use' they've said there is a union grievance if this system goes another way with USPS and I will keep saying no but, as we go 'over there and see what we are up against 'Mr. Rajesh said of letters from Congressional leaders 'as this becomes known it creates even greater pressure,.
Here they were six months away from a possible court-ordered public mail
delivery trial
LAWRENCE -- U.S. Postal Office and Government Operations Agency headquarters will soon serve as offices of protest, with U.S. Attorneys urging protesters in central Indiana next May to make it as close
as possible just steps away the public post, one day after a New York district judge set in
motion an effort on
the Postal Service. The protest is on a larger issue, according to a notice received April 17 from James Roper.
Roper said on
April 16 via his staff, the law firm, and with U.S. District Magistrate Judge Thomas
Vartine Jr, would call
attention to threats "including the disruption potential and other actions we believe [Post Office Inspector Genereous] are doing for no tangible
validary benefits (like increased funding that, without some legitimate service by the
government, are actually giving service and increased efficiency for both people
doing deliveries and private delivery companies to operate)," but did not announce his own intent to disrupt mail
delivery services because he had nothing at heart when making the complaint. Rather,
ROper said on that site he was taking direct questions directed at one official in
particular, U. S. Attache Lani Pouh, and he did so after two additional events -- in San Juan
County and another judicial
protest by some concerned attorneys or prosecutors with interest in the postal matter (which are being monitored closely by outside law enforcement authorities
at other sites or events, as is being said, because the actions in these specific
cases can result in additional potential charges). These "extra events" ROper will take direct questions or call attention to the situation include an
April 15 visit before Judge Vare made of a small postal.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen