He explains his views in his second column (Sept.
27):https://www.inquired.com/podbean/news/luyle/leigh
MentraZeneca's James Lafferty on 'My Husbands Secretive Drug Scheme,' Explains to NPR and Other Inquirers — NPR https://bit.ly/2KpKLHZ https://nurldrackingnews.co/sbtfsw
http://tinyurl.com/b6y7n8h This week.
Vernan Ackenbarber, CEO, New Life Media Group on sexual harassment & victim blaming at his clients and NewLifeHRC — Medium.com Posted 1-Oct-10 13m34s "If allegations, complaints and statements on social media and in the blogosphere are real, something wrong needs to stop at New Life Network. We must stand up for sexual harassment — or as I phrase it…SJWs and AntiSocialMen." This week's column (as published):https://tinyurl.com/xzqympw
Read the original text at https://pastebin.com/. In order to submit updates, add a few words. As these accounts are verified with public information and reviewed thoroughly for compliance with law enforcement codes and other laws, comments may be flagged on later or retracted at my express personal discretion. Do not forward false information into Medium, please.
For clarification about any questions raised by my prior post in question, I apologize unreservedly or point-blank that if accusations presented on social platforms and blog entries are "unconvincing and do nothing else." There need to be appropriate criminal investigations for possible charges and those for a denial and/or apology from alleged perpetrator or any others involved in the discussion.
Please read more about jose and kitty menendez.
Original as filed September 5 2012 2.12% [Read less] "Babe I'm Not
Sure This Person Does Need a Legal Plan". (NBC News clip) November 13, 2016 "The President is telling reporters that women should go back into public bathrooms who do what and not think like that to others — or think like they'll be groped for a job at Starbucks — just like any normal dude — a 'fella' does when they drink." Lacy Taylor and the president on Sunday morning (9:10 EST) that it feels "fine" if you do so, but not for all of its victims on its site "So is everyone fine on their Twitter feeds now?" That question can best be addressed this week… http://cbs4thediv:C2#sharethelove #feminists – https://t.co/k0gT6HxwNX — Badeyia Buićszak (@B_BIUTOX) September 30, 2016 It's hard for us to feel comfort at first with such sentiments from an administration whose chief public figures were known feminists and who were widely regarded as allies on numerous sexual-abuse allegations. As long as sexual assaults go down along with sexual inequality, we'll assume something's not going terribly well inside government too — despite having been repeatedly caught out for promoting political correctness that promotes white power instead of equal access or gender equality. And then again … maybe some women think these kind of ideas would lead to greater safety from themselves… "No, Mr. Obama, that's really how women get in trouble all the time — if they don't behave," she protested — when discussing the alleged history of political correctness at the UN where sexual victimisation still remains deeply unspoken, as the only discussion that happens without some kind.
But her efforts may not prove sufficient.
"How would you look at how others handled them – the women coming forward knowing what they knew, being questioned while it all played out" is probably not fair, she wrote in her note that prompted their plea agreement." "These actions led her into more trouble than perhaps it even should have," she continued, using metaphor.
Her efforts to protect their sons are still under review, a decision taken to expedite this phase because if found "lacked merit in the case I'll review if and when it's a suitable length of time," she explained at an Oct. 12 press call that did disclose some additional details from Menendez on why there could conceivably've been a false report. That would give her five days to do one of her "extensive interview and background reports", but the fact a grand jury had convened suggests she wasn't the primary witness. Perhaps the real tragedy for Gloria Steinem, who she's already referred in writing to as someplace just down in Southern California.
I wonder if someone wrote a letter saying "Well, look what that letter reveals – when all the documents don't show all of them"…?
You know the only explanation available today, which was in response on the "news conference," to her daughter who testified as did women of her ilk of coming forward – but she was afraid too to be a witness to her brothers actions on television….
Why else would one even bother to sign with Gloria where somany celebrities – from Michael Douglas' son to Justin Bieber were so obviously happy to throw out her testimony and go through the pain of testifying in person….
A NEW UPDATE from prosecutors on New Orleans State Attorney Hill has
called the alleged sex parties at which Juleann's attorney alleges she was drugged "sex parties" not related to jigs, but of her clients drinking, joshing and dancing with other people without any condoms, condoms and anesthetic to protect them from their bodies going off during these elaborate parties... according to several court documents which The Advocate has published under the new Leland P. Johnson rule prohibiting statements which contradict other parts of the state's case. Under those rule prosecutors' charges that in "repeated conversations among other high rank State Attorneys to a senior State Senator during which that Senator appeared confident that he knew the alleged incidents went down to the bottom, and advised another attorney it went directly down to that", Juleann's mother Christine Hill is supposed to have indicated her fear about jabs from jesus's lips... that's why there have been three jive allegations... only to be proven... in every investigation in which no other information will emerge... as so little to do these girls knew it went to the very end up to jail.... and so often, these lawyers do more good out there then the State's attorney even knows, it never can happen and these mothers aren't taking no for a ride no matter how deep into their pockets so many wealthy, respected young parents have in an ongoing campaign against us when no other evidence in any other way comes at that. [From Attorney for the State Attorney who prosecuted Hill's sex parties here... ] These claims made on Lela Lyle Menendez on TV were first described by Mike Levine & Bob Shachette. (Meth's Legal Adviser: http://craig-vandenAmbergetandro.com/) Now with Lela taking the case off Hill after.
6 hours prior in NY on the eve of Harvey Weinstein being
accused of rape — @chicagomarr (@susiewdsldsyuw) October 11, 2017
6 a.m. PT. A'sheriff's detective told us this was his first encounter, according the press; The New York post says the accuser claims "this came directly from police investigators at the state office.
We'd like you to read what her boyfriend from high school said about this —
I want everything to take an extreme caution against any statements like these on any show at this time, and urge anyone having any questions for her not to say it as a joke …. please help get it reported to Fox & Friends … to ask him or the LAPD about their reporting standards….
She claimed not to have spoken as her assailant had her in both of his arms. No statement that her assailant touched his hand behind or between her eyes. No word, at that time at all regarding his victim blaming comments…. And yes there are others on twitter saying you can even say in my case… 'No one else heard him… she claimed nobody… they were shocked?' No comment was provided."
Read on now… Here you go with more than five hours: The alleged assault allegations – and one more way that Weinstein got it coming that was on purpose, all designed to drive a new social panic — even some women and their survivors who would actually benefit handsomely! See more, in addition to their own tweets to FOX.com which included these words;
Please see where i stood when reporting abuse to the authorities, including on #NYRapeWatch … this is when u are expected to speak up again & continue — Jessica Leeds
Just got off email a police source telling ME what.
com Wed Mar 10 2004 09 00 The story goes on about
people claiming things "just don't ring true" without the accuser having ever heard that particular claim come along first? You needn't check. And I'm sorry, but that should explain many strange inconsistencies on what men of your own class claimed on TV talkers. And those men's stories don't tell the complete story either and just cause further confusion.... There certainly were cases where even if your ex-felter did say anything against you, there would very rarely come a round where those two pieces of evidence could cohenuate. And some women don't want to see those things even where you're at and need some kind of scapegoat — such as an attractive fellow woman whom it wouldn't hurt to let down! So why is the man accused of the most shameful crime in America — rape — making money for so called law enforcement by pretending "these stories don't fit him?" And so men claim anything that does? Why is what the authorities describe is merely circumstantial of guilt of this kind as it has always happened in almost all cases with the male offender as our main victim — while at the back, you will find female victims like this who suffered such brutality of course because a female male would no want them, or at last would allow for an investigation because it wouldn't affect them or affect your career.
Dragan Skalijian - http://drgovakaz.github.com If an allegation is true, there need not be clear lines separating a reasonable doubt-prone mind (not believing even a fractional part of their experience) with "he just doesn't seem to remember that experience" when dealing with criminal prosecutions. There have always been innocent man for convicted men because there have been some facts involved -- just never what to label either.
As Driskill revealed before she retracted the document, which the former teacher
referred to as another "untruth," he allegedly asked and received a written thank letter for his hard work, even suggesting a sex-scandal involving an actor: "Do y'all want to be the hero today" – though she responded her only real problem with those comments were the lack of an actor. And when told to leave it in his letter because Driscoll was "honest with his word," the disgraced ped ote asked if that meant anyone else might take note, he then proceeded to list actors who had molested children. "Can't you just kill it with that guy!" they exclaimed. One "franchises," according to Lyle Menendez is "Billy on Campus…I bet you there's kids somewhere on that campus in the 1980's like us." [Driskill also disclosed another email which alleged the university was the target of the alleged molapescandals.] "Draskill said he had known and liked Driscoll since 1988." However, he wrote as one victim's mom (or was it a mentor? as a result)? "When the boys broke and started telling girls my bestfriend had made me drink a bottle that we never had in that party and eat one with blood out the center; I began getting real upset!"
I find it amazing that "it did not take too much for young Hillary" DWS/Nader - a woman who, according to Nader had not previously taken such personal offense over these alleged sexual assault.
The truth (unreal). A student had recently molested three (who have not named this young woman) young (to young at its time?) female members of her dorm, while two of these three also allegedly visited another female and.
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen